There are three forces effecting when a ray moves throuhgh the space.
One force Awhich pushes it forwards.
One force B which makes the particle to rotate around its rotatio axis.
And one force C towards the axis.
From the side we see it as a wave, but it is aconstant spiral.
When the wavelength is shortened the tops of the waves get nearer eachother.
When the force that pushes the wave forwards get weaker then the wavelength
gets shorter.
When the force that pushes the wave forwards contracts so much that the wave
passes itself there will be a spiral lika handwritten e -letters after eachother.
This is near the situation when the separate waves form rotating circles.
The wave has becom a particle.

SKAL = shell
We claim that one and one is two.
But in all cases when we combine one and one the result is bigger than two. Or sometimes smaller than two. The model
example is a tile that you cannot push into a hole exactly as long as the tile.

We find that every unit has a shell, or a surface that is not even. Thus the unit
is bigger than its nominal size.

This shell surrounds all units in mathematics. We also find that randomness might be the result from this shell. A unit is never exactly one. And this applies also to the extension in time.
When a ray goes out into the universe it can have such an angle that it never hits
any particle. This is proved as the tangent to an angle can be an endles number.
As in the picture the ray never hits any crossing of the lines.
If the universe is
digital in any form, then energy will disappear never to be cought again.
Euklides geometry is all wrong. He thinks there exist tools for drawing the forms.
But the tools must also be constructed, and they are meade of forms. The main
error comes when he constructs figures like a circle, doing things.

Everything with form is made using time. Probably the spirals are the basic
forms for everything. There are forces making the forms. And then there are
rules for the forces.
The gravitation is radiation.
It is hard to understand that something kan suck, like the gravitation
is explanend. Instead it is easy to understand that something can push
like a radiation can do.

In the picture is an item above a planet. The radiation that shall
penetrate through the planet is diminished and the radiation that
hits the item towards the planet is still strong. Thus it pushes
the item towards the planet. All radiation from sides in any angel
is counteracted and not to count with. 

The radiation referred to might come evenly (mainly) from the outer
frontier of the universe and is the same in all directions. So this
radiation does not come from any celestial body.

The dimension of celestial bodies are meassured wrong as their
gravitation is thought to depend on the mass of the bodies.

The "gravitation" I refer to depends on the thickness of the
celestial body considering the roundness of it.

This means the gravitation does not grow in the third exponential
pover but by the growth of the diameter. We have got celestial
bodies by calculation that are much smaller than the real ones.
And also much denser than the real ones.

To observe a star´s gravitation on a planet we suppose the
star is much smaller and denser than it is.

The minimum universe.
You always think that nothing is the minimum that not creating anything will result in nothing. But there is a fact that when something is, then there is always the loss of the opposite. That means that if you have something of the size of ten, then the opposite is without this ten amount. There is never an emptiness but a kind of mediums which are either or.

All the particles in the world are different algorithms which are repeated in a
large amount. At least from our standpoint. So the world consist of a rather
little group of algorithms. You can compare the world with a computer program.
The only program that can exist as such one is the smallest one.
So if you only take one example of every particle or say algorithm you can have them in a teaspoon. And that is the real size of the universe.

I think about the Big Bang. The atom at your finger tip was at the center of the big bang. Just like all atoms were. There was never a big bang, but you
experience that the relation between the items of the world grew from a point. That point is here and everywhere. You see the distances, but that is only what you see. But they are only relative distances and all based on your standpoint or say based by your belief.

Return to the first claim. Everything has to be in the simplest way. And everything that is must have its opposite. The simplest way is when there is a maximum mess. Then nothing is steering anything. All possible forms just exist. And that is the way the universe is.  

The construction of the universe
There was no Big Bang.
The first rather primitive assumption is that there was a beginning and before that there was "nothing". The universe was just a point.

Then we start to think that time and all dimensions had to exist before
the universe. Because the universe expands into something?
Or the universe is like an enormous bubble. There is nothing outside
and all dimensions and all time must only exist inside the bubble.
The background radiation is the thin surface of the bubble.

We can assume that a "thing" expands until it has no different features
within itself. Then it is again even and only one thing. All within the thing
are eaxactly the same. So there is nothing but the "thing" itself. At that moment the "thing" starts over again so create different parts within
itself. We can see the universe as such a "thing".

But may be the development happens in many sections. May be there are
small Big Bangs all over the sky. And mey be they  become even without
any separat parts and then starts over again "from one point". When we
see the galaxies and heaps of stars and gases in the universe, we really
see many Big Bangs and parts of the universe separatedly develope
like we thougt the whole universe was developing. So instead of having
a Big Bang and an end, we have Big Bangs all the time and ends also
all the time.

How about time itself? May be time is a construction from the parts of
the universe. May be time is never even, but itself changes. May be time
is also a feature a kind of "thing", spreading out and loosing its momentum. And that happens in every star heap or galaxy. And all this
happens within the rules of total maximum mess.